www.mothersmovement.org
Resources and reporting for mothers and others who think about social change.
home
directory
features
noteworthy
opinion
essays
books
resources
get active
discussion
mail
submissions
e-list
about mmo
search
 
mmo blog
 

Brown people by Rachel Ida Buff

page four

I have not heard Celeste talk about the issue of color as a negative thing about Hartford since our first tour. I think because it became for her, on that day, her school. She can talk freely about the skin color of different kids on the playground, something few white people I know can do. She now addresses all around our neighborhood, who ask her constantly in a somewhat surprised tone how she likes Hartford. "It's the school for me!," she says emphatically. We ask her so much that I sometimes wonder if she will learn to assume that something must be wrong. Hopefully, she will instead learn to assign the repeated questions to the category of ridiculous things that adults do.

Sometimes, though, when we walk north to play in the new and ample playgrounds of the suburban grade school in Shorewood, I wonder if I am taking something away from Celeste. I look at that school. The building is older, like Hartford, but it has been rehab-ed and landscaped. Flowers and hedges intersperse four large play areas with state-of-the-art equipment. It's a wonderful place to spend a spring afternoon.

And I feel like I am buffeted between two ideas of the public. On the one hand, there is my older idea, rooted in a social vision of equality that holds out to Celeste and Sylvie the possibility of living in a world with lots of different people, and learning from all of them. In this idea of the public, we are all in it together- rich people, poor people, upper middle class; Black, white, Latino, Asian, American Indian. Our physical plant, like the one at Hartford, is overused and antiquated, but we clash and differ and figure it out together. Our children are loved and protected, and they learn from one and other, much as Celeste has learned from her friends to deal with the noise and chaos of public school lunchtime. In this public, our strength is diversity, and the creativity and good will that come with it.

My other idea is, I think, a historically newer one. It emanates from twenty-five years of savage war against the older idea of collectivity and diversity. During these twenty-five years, funding for public education has been repeatedly, cruelly, cut. Many schools in the Milwaukee Public School system do not have the arts and music curriculum that Hartford does. Cynthia writes grants to get private funding for these.

Fleeing the battered and besieged public, many people have invented a different idea of the public. The most extreme example of what I would call the sheltering public might be gated communities, which have public spaces within them that are carefully maintained for only a select few. Like the Shorewood school building, this public is carefully trimmed and pruned; children are sheltered and taken care of. In many ways, in this second idea of the public, children need to be sheltered from the rundown diversity of the other public. This sheltering public nurtures and protects children with small class sizes, extra-curricular activities, pedagogies that inspire twenty kids rather than disciplining forty of them. Who wouldn't want their child cosseted in such an environment?
Thing is, this cozy and caring public is also remote. It can only be called public by dint of unequal tax dollars, residential segregation, and increasingly inequality. While the schools of Shorewood are public schools, such plush environments are not open to everyone.

And I want both experiences of the public for my kids -- the nurturing public and the diverse one. Thing is, they are pretty much mutually exclusive at this point. You live in the city, you get the rundown public schools; you move to the suburbs and suddenly your grade school has marigolds growing outside it. An older idea of the public might have offered small class sizes and nurturing pedagogies to every child -- a real No Child Left Behind policy -- but ours discriminates. And that injustice informs every decision we make about educating our children.

I read over this essay and see that it is anchored by the central figures of Eric and Hartford University School. So in trying to figure out how Celeste and other kids like her learn about race, I have spent a lot of time talking about a Black man who is one or two steps away from being homeless, and an urban public school that flourishes despite being, always, one or two steps away from the grave consequences of budget shortfalls. These two figures signal the difficult historical moment that our children pass through on their ways to being educated about the world and its inequalities.

mmo : november 2005

Rachel Ida Buff writes, teaches history and Ethnic Studies, and lives with her partner, two daughters and four cats in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | print |

Reuse of content for publication or compensation by permission only.
© 2003-2008 The Mothers Movement Online.

editor@mothersmovement.org

The Mothers Movement Online