|
mmo
Noteworthy
December 2005 |
work-life
reports:
It's
the labor market, stupid:
Debunking the "opt out" myth
New
report on flexible working rights in Europe finds cost, inconvenience
to employers is small
Two
new reports on older workers
Notable
news and commentary on work-life issues
|
values
vote:
New
poll finds women voters value affordable health care
|
younger
women:
MADRE
tribute to young women activists
Winter
2005 newsletter from the Younger Women's Task Force
|
elsewhere
on the web:
Selected
news and commentary on women, family, culture and reproductive
health & rights
|
past
editions of mmo noteworthy ... |
work-life
reports: |
It's
the labor market, stupid:
Debunking the "opt out"
myth
A new
analysis by Heather Boushey for the
Center for Economic Policy Research finds women's employment data "provides no evidence"
to support rumors an "opt out" revolution is underway.
In fact, when Boushey study data from 2004, she discovered "the
impact of having children in the home on women's labor force participation
(the 'child penalty') fell compared to prior years," and
concludes any recent declines in mothers' rates of employment
is consistent with labor force participation trends of women workers
overall. As Boushey reports,
The
data stand in opposition to the media frenzy on this topic. In
spite of the personal anecdotes highlighted in various news stories,
women are not increasingly dropping out of the labor force because
of their kids. The main reasons for declining labor force participation
rates among women over the last four years appears to be the weakness
of the labor market.
Boushey
also notes that thirty-something married, middle- and upper middle-class
mothers with advanced degrees -- who've been the focus of news
reports and commentaries on mothers abandoning elite professions
to stay home with the kids -- represent just 3.2 percent of U.S.
mothers. "The real story of how 'American mothers' are balancing
work and family cannot be found in the trends of such a small
and extremely advantaged group," Boushey writes. "This
group of mothers is advantaged compared to other prime-age mothers
in terms of not only educational attainment and earnings potential,
but they are more likely to be married (91.2 percent versus 78.3
percent of all mothers aged 25 to 44) and are highly likely to
have a spouse who also has very high earnings potential. Further,
they are more likely to be in the kinds of jobs that provide the
benefits and workplace flexibility that makes work/family balance
not entirely an oxymoron."
However,
Boushey did find that while highly educated, married mothers in
their thirties were more likely to be employed than mothers in
other educational groups, if they were not in the paid workforce,
they did have young children at home. " In short, the overwhelming
majority of thirty-something women with advanced degrees do not
opt out if they have kids," she explains, "but if they
do opt out, they have kids. This is less the case for other women,
making this group truly exceptional."
Boushey
found that the child penalty, which is measured as the difference
between the labor force participation rates of women with children
at home and those without, fell overall from a 20.7 percentage
point difference in 1984 to 8.2 percentage points in 2004.
Center
for Economic Policy Research
www.cepr.net
Are
Women Opting Out? Debunking the Myth
Heather Boushey, Center
for Economic Policy Research, Nov.05
16 pages, in .pdf
Opt-Out
Hype
Heather Boushey, TomPaine.com,
7.dec.05
Also
from CEPR:
Impact
of Proposed Minimum-Wage Increase on Low-income Families
Heather Boushey and John Schmitt,
Center for Economic
Policy Research, dec.05
"Increasing the federal minimum wage to $7.25 per hour over
the next 26 months as proposed in the 'The Fair Minimum Wage Act
of 2005,' would raise the annual earnings of the average full-time,
full-year, minimum-wage worker2 by $1,520 per year."
–
back to top
–
|
New
report on flexible working rights in Europe finds cost, inconvenience
to employers is small
A study of the uptake
of new labor laws in Germany, the Netherlands and the U.K. giving
workers the right to request reduced hour or flexible scheduled
finds the number of employee requests have been manageable, that
most request were acceptable to employers, and that costs were not
a major problem of implementation. The report by Ariane
Hegewisch for the Center for Work Life
Law at UC Hasting College of the Law, notes American companies
can learn from Europe:
The European
experience suggests that employers have little to fear from employee
rights to flexible working. The floodgates have not opened and
the new individual rights to reduced hours and flexible working,
designed as they are to take account of business factors, have
not caused problems for the vast majority of employers. Rather
than forcing a sea change, the laws have strengthened the existing
trend among employers to offer flexible working arrangements.
The laws are no magic wand to overcome hostility towards new work
arrangements, stereotyping and differential treatment of people
on flexible schedules or the lack of imagination of how things
could be done differently. But these laws are helping employers
in Europe to push the boundaries of work organization and to establish
new ways of doing things which benefit both employers and society.
In particular, the CWLL
study found employers were not flooded with requests for shorter
hours (most received less than five), and allowing all employees
to apply for flexibility, rather than just parents, makes better
business sense. The report also found both men and women wanted
flexibility, but women were more likely overall to request flexible
or reduced hours, while men were more likely to request flex-time
or other arrangements that would not affect their income. The author
also notes that men's requests were more likely to be denied than
women's, and "Such a differential response potentially constitutes
sex discrimination and has been challenged as such in the courts."
Center
for Work Life Law
www.worklifelaw.org
Employers
and European Flexible Working Rights:
When the Floodgates Were Opened
Issue Brief by Ariane Hegewisch for the Center
for Work Life Law, Fall 2005
7 pages, in .pdf
–
back to top
– |
Two
new reports on older workers
According to two new
reports released by The Center on Aging and
Work/Workplace Flexibility and Families
and Work Institute, today's older workers will usher in new
patterns of working and retirement
In a December 12 press
release, Ellen Galinsky, president
and co-founder of Families and Work Institute remarked, “In
2006, Boomers will begin turning 60 years-old, and they will likely
change what we know about aging and retirement in America. For example,
we know that Baby Boomers are more likely to be work-centric than
other generations and the majority of older workers do not want
to reduce their job responsibilities, but rather want to keep the
same level of responsibilities in the future.”
The first report, Context
Matters: Insights about Older Workers from the National Study of
the Changing Workforce, found that older workers are more
likely to continue working when they have more control over their
work hours, workplace flexibility, job autonomy and learning opportunities.
The second report reveals
the differences between older men and women in the workforce. For
instance, the report found that older women earn only 55 cents for
every dollar that men earn from all hours worked at all jobs. When
comparing hourly rates of pay at main jobs (with salaries converted
to hourly rates), older women earn 69 cents for every dollar older
men earn.
Other key findings from
The Diverse Employment Experiences of Men
and Women Older Workers include:
- On average, the family
income of older women in the workforce was $64,444 in 2002 compared
to the $80,839 family income of older men.
- Older men (80 percent)
are more likely than women (62 percent) to be married or living
with a partner, providing them with a potential source of social
support.
- Older men employees
are more likely than women to indicate that they are “very
satisfied” with their family life (58 vs. 49 percent). Furthermore,
older men have better mental health on average than older women,
with 40 percent of men versus 26 percent of women experiencing
good mental health.
Families
and Work Institute
www.familiesandwork.org
Context
Matters: Insights about Older Workers
from the National Study of the Changing Workforce
James T. Bond, Ellen Galinski, Marcie Pitt-Catsouphes, Michael Smyer,
dec.05
14 pages, in .pdf
The
Diverse Employment Experiences of Men and Women Older Workers
James T. Bond, Ellen Galinski, Marcie Pitt-Catsouphes, Michael Smyer,
dec.05
19 pages, in .pdf
–
back to top
– |
Notable
news and commentary on work-life issues
Conversations
with Experts:
Ruth Milkman -- The California Paid Leave Program
Network News, Sloan
Work and Family Research Network, nov.2005
"Although California's program is weak relative to most other
countries' paid leave provisions, it's the only state in the U.S.
that offers any type of paid leave. For other states, just the fact
that it exists in California proves that it is possible –
even in America!" 5 pages, in .pdf
The
Price of Motherhood
Steven E. Landsburg, Slate,
9.dec.05
"Ready to have a baby? You'll earn 10 percent more if you wait
a year." Description of the methodology of an economic analysis
showing a woman who has her first child at 24 will have lower earnings
than a woman who becomes a first-time mother at 25.
Those
Who Step Out of Careers Face Tough Re-entry
Sheryl Nance-Nash, Women's
eNews, 16.dec.05
More women than men take time off from work, leaving women particularly
susceptible to the turbulent process of re-entering the work force.
To retain such workers, a recent study recommends companies improve
flex-time and retraining programs.
Women's
struggles, men's aspirations
combine to redefine "stay-at-home dad"
Penelope Trunk, Boston
Globe/BostonWorks, 11.dec.05
"As more men call themselves stay-at-home dads, they redefine
for both men and women what it means to stay home with kids. Men
have learned a lot from watching women struggle with home life.
The superwoman syndrome of the 1980s squashed the desire to juggle
committed parenting with a 60-hour workweek, and the Rolling Stones'
lyrics about valium as 'mother's little helper' do not fall on deaf
ears; raising kids is hard."
Many
undergraduates face a grueling path
in juggling studies with jobs and family duties
By Maggie Jackson, Boston
Globe/BostonWorks, 18.dec.05
"Welcome to campus life in 2005. For some, it's still a carefree
time to party or think deeply. But for a growing number of Americans,
college is a frantic juggle of jobs and studies and even family
responsibilities. Squeezed by financial pressures, half of full-time
college students age 16 to 24 were employed in 2003, up from 34
percent in 1970. Currently, more than one-quarter of all undergrads
are parents."
Farewell
to the Working Class
Austin Kelley, The
Nation, 15.dec.05
"Celebrations of leisure like Carl Honoré's In Praise
of Slowness, John de Graaf's Take Back Your Time and
Pat Kane's The Play Ethic have suggested that in the industrialized
West we need a less hectic, more deliberate working life. In the
past year two new guides to the lazy life, Tom Hodgkinson's How
to Be Idle and Corinne Maier's Bonjour Laziness: Jumping
Off the Corporate Ladder, have gone further, calling for a
regime of revolutionary leisure in which the workforce stops being...
well, a workforce." Review and commentary.
–
back to top
– |
values
vote: |
New
poll finds women voters value affordable health care
Americans
for Health Care,
a project of SEIU and EMILY’s
List, recently released results of a joint national survey
conducted by Lake Research Partners which suggest health care is
an extremely powerful issue for women voters and will play a critical
role in the 2006 elections. Researchers also found that 86 percent
of women voters agreed (72 percent strongly) that "real family
values means valuing families by having affordable health care and
jobs that pay well enough to actually let families spend time together."
Other highlights of the
findings include:
- 61 percent of women
say the issue of health care will be the most important or one
of the most important issues in making their footing decision
for Congress in 2006, in part because 78 percent were worried
they or their family might not be able to afford the health care
services they need.
- 90 percent of women
agree (78 percent strongly) that everyone has a right to affordable
quality health care.
- 86 percent of women
and 80 percent of men favor requiring profitable companies with
over 500 employees to either provide health insurance for their
employees or pay a percentage of their payroll into a health-care
fund.
- A strong majority
of men and women (71 and 66 percent, respectively) favor "expanding
access to affordable, quality health care for all Americans even
if it means raising taxes."
- 56 percent of women
and 78 percent of men want to hear candidates speak to the immorality
of so many families without access to affordable tear while Congress
gives tax breaks to oil companies -- particularly when this message
comes from a female candidate.
Detailed results of the
poll show that women voters were also very concerned about education
and the War in Iraq. Findings were based on a poll of 1,000 voters
(300 men, 700 women) conducted in November 2005.
Americans
for Health Care
/www.americansforhealthcare.org
EMILY's
List
www.emilyslist.org
Service
Employees International Union
www.seiu.org
Summary
findings of the National Survey on Health Care
SEIU/Americans for Health Care/EMILY's List, 8.dec.05
8 pages, in .pdf
–
back to top
– |
younger
women: |
MADRE
tribute to young women activists
In a holiday season when
so much is wrong in the world and women's and human rights are under
assault, MADRE's new online photo gallery
of young women working for social justice brings special comfort
and joy. Launched on December 10, Human Rights Day, Fighting
for Our Future: A Tribute to Young Women Inspiring Change in the
Spirit of Nora Astorga features photos and short biographies
of over two dozen young women working to improve conditions for
women and children in communities around the globe. A reproduction
of the gallery will be displayed at the United Nations during March
2006 -- international women’s month.
MADRE is an international
women's human rights organization that works in partnership with
community-based women’s groups worldwide. The groups program's
and projects are guided by the UN Millennium Development Goals,
which aim to: eradicate extreme poverty and hunger; achieve universal
primary education; promote gender equality and empower women; reduce
child mortality; improve maternal health; combat HIV/AIDS, malaria
and other diseases; ensure environmental sustainability; and develop
a global partnership for development. MADRE provides resources and
training to enable sister organizations to meet these goals by addressing
immediate needs in their communities and developing long-term solutions
to the crises they face. Since 1983, MADRE has delivered over 21
million dollars worth of support to community-based women's groups
in Latin America, the Caribbean, the Middle East, Africa, the Balkans,
Asia, and the United States.
MADRE
www.madre.org
Fighting
for Our Future:
A Tribute to Young Women Inspiring Change
–
back to top
–
|
Winter
2005 newsletter from
the Younger Women's Task Force
The Younger
Women's Task Force
of the National Council of Women's Organizations recently published its Winter 2005 newsletter reporting on activities
of YWTF regional chapters, what's at stake for younger women in
changes to the Supreme Court, and the Task Force's collaboration
on the "The Real Hot 100," a project combating stereotypes
of younger women in the media.
In 2005, 135 younger
women from 42 different states responded to a call to “mobilize
and organize younger women across the country, thereby defining
our own women’s movement.” At that
first national Meet-Up, YWTF members drafted the Younger
Women’s Issues Agenda and launched YWTF’s first
eleven regional chapters across the country. Today, YWTF has 1,200
members and is organizing younger women in over 30 states.
Younger
Women's Task Force
www.ywtf.org
Younger
Women's Task Force Newsletter, Winter 2005
9 pages, in .pdf
–
back to top
– |
elsewhere
on the web: |
Selected
news and commentary on women, family, culture and reproductive
health & rights
The
stay-at-home mystique
Rebecca Traister, Salon,
6.dec.05
A new magazine, Total 180, is targeted at moms who have "opted
out." But its pages are full of despairing screams, no sex,
and women who are "let out" weekly by husbands.
The
latest motherhood advice is not about raising children:
The only acceptable stay-at-home moms are yummy
Anne Kingston, Canada.com,
19.nov.05
"There's little doubt that added to the stresses of being a
mother in 2005 is having to measure up as a "fashion icon"
and "sex symbol." Then there's also the indignity of having
the back-breaking work and self-sacrifice involved in motherhood
minimized as a "lifestyle" choice designed for self-fulfillment."
Holiday
Toys Sell Girls on Primping and Passivity
Caryl Rivers and Rosalind Barnett, Women's
eNews, 23.nov.05
Toy buyers beware this holiday shopping season. Caryl Rivers and
Rosalind C. Barnett say pink-and-blue aisles and gender-coded departments
are stocked high with gender bias that sends a message to girls
to be passive.
Babies
Not On Board
John Freeman, AlterNet,
8.dec.05
My dream girlfriend wouldn't give me the one thing I longed for
most: fatherhood. But is it worth giving up everything else?
Child-Support
Collection Cutbacks Are Shameful
Cindy Elmore, Women's
eNews, 11.nov.05
With $95 billion in unpaid child support last year, Cindy Elmore
deplores the recent federal cuts in aid for custodial parents. Busy
single parents, she says, deserve a national child-support enforcement
system to save them precious time and money.
Why
Women Snap
Silja J.A. Talvi, AlterNet,
14.dec.05
A new TV series ignores the reality that cold-hearted women who
are out for themselves are only a tiny fraction of those doing time
for murder.
Men's
Place
Annalee Newitz, AlterNet,
29.nov.05
Norwegian scientists have discovered that male-dominated societies
are doomed to extinction. What does this mean for feminism?
New
Prenatal Tests Raise Hopes and Fears
Molly M. Ginty, Women's
eNews, 29.nov.05
Recently developed prenatal tests can detect genetic abnormalities
and peg gender earlier than ever before. But some health advocates
are concerned these tests could increase the number of selective
abortions and even lead to "designer babies."
Abortion:
Trouble in Numbers?
Jennifer Baumgardner, Nerve.com,
21.nov.05
Even among pro-choice activists, why does having more than one abortion
imply a woman has been 'careless'?
The
Pro-Life Continuum
David Morris, AlterNet,
19.dec.05
From sperm to zygote to fetus to baby, isn't it time we brought
some precision to the language of the reproductive rights debate?
A
History of (Pro-Life) Violence
Steve Almond, AlterNet,
1.dec.05
Not all anti-abortionists kill people. But all share a histrionic
view of themselves as heroic rescuers aligned against Godless fornicators.
States
Say No To Sex-Ed Dough
Brian H. Kehrl, AlterNet,
3.dec.05
Maine has become the latest state to reject federal funding for
sex education programs that teach only abstinence.
–
back to top
– |
December
2005
previously
in mmo noteworthy ... |
|
|