www.mothersmovement.org
Resources and reporting for mothers and others who think about social change.
home
directory
features
noteworthy
opinion
essays
books
resources
get active
discussion
mail
submissions
e-list
about mmo
search
 
mmo blog
 

Noteworthy

From the May 2004 edition:


Court rules employers can’t assume mothers
are less committed to their jobs

On April 7, a federal court of appeals ruled in favor of an employed mother who is suing her employer for discrimination because she was repeatedly told that she could not be a mother and do her job well. Legal experts believe the ruling may make it easier for similar cases to be tried in the future. According to Cynthia Calvert, an employment attorney and deputy director of the Program on WorkLife Law at American University Washington College of Law, “employees who are also caregivers and have been stymied in their careers have begun to sue their employers. With each new case, it becomes more clear how to do so successfully.”

More information and a press release on the case are available on the Program on WorkLife Law Web site: www.worklifelaw.org

CBS Evening News Report: Fighting Maternal Discrimination (11/13/2002)

back to top


New reports track national trends
in paid leave, sick leave, child care

1. According to a new report from the Institute for Women’s Policy Research (www.iwpr.org), 86 million U.S. workers lack paid sick leave to care for sick kids. Using an analysis of data from the U.S. Department of Labor, No Time to be Sick: Why Everyone Suffers When Workers Don’t Have Paid Sick Leave found that employees in medium and large private establishments were significantly less likely to have paid sick leave coverage in 1997 than they were in 1986, and that workers in the private sector, non-union workers and part-time employees were less likely to have paid sick leave than other workers. Only 16 percent of part time workers had paid sick-leave coverage, compared to 60% of full-time workers, and fewer than 1 out of 3 of all employees with paid sick leave coverage are permitted to use sick leave for medical appointments or to care for a sick child.

May 5, 2004 Press Release from IWPR:
Businesses And Families Suffer Without Paid Sick Leave:
New Report Finds that Half of All Workers Do Not Have Paid Sick Leave
(in .pdf)

No Time to be Sick:
Why Everyone Suffers When Workers Don’t Have Paid Sick Leave
By Vicki Lovell, Ph.D. for the Institute for Women’s Policy Research, May 2004
(in .pdf)

—————————

2. The Urban Institute (www.urban.org) recently published a report on working parents’ access to paid and unpaid leave. Getting Time Off: Access to Leave Among Working Parents uses new data from the National Survey of American Families to chart the employment and demographic characteristics of parents with and without access to leave. The study finds that:

Women are less likely than men to have any paid leave (including vacation days, sick leave, personal days and other forms of paid leave), and among working parents with access to paid leave women are more likely to have only one workweek or less of paid leave, while men are more likely to have more than three workweeks of leave.

Workers with a great need for leave— parents with very young children— are the least likely to have it.

Single parents are less likely than married parents to have any access to paid leave: married parents are more likely to have access to more than three workweeks of paid leave, while single parents are more likely to have one workweek or less.

Part-time workers and workers with fewer years on their current jobs are less likely to have any paid leave.

More than half of poor workers, working welfare recipients and workers who recently left welfare cannot take paid leave from their jobs.

Getting Time Off: Access to Leave Among Working Parents
Katherin Ross Phillips, The Urban Institute, April 2004

Related article from Women’s eNews (www.womensenew.org):
Paid Sick Leave is Rare for Low-Income Women
By Marianne Sullivan, run date 4/29/04

—————————

3. The Center for Economic and Policy Research (www.cepr.net) released a report on working mother’s use and access to child care. Of all working mothers with children under six, 90 percent reported using some kind of child care. The study finds that while child care is a problem for all working mothers, lower income mothers face the greatest difficulties in securing adequate child care. In 2001, working mothers who depended on non-familial child care were most likely to use formal, center-based care. While the average weekly cost of child care per child in the most affluent households is between 4.5 and 6 percent of household income, weekly expenditures on child care per child in the poorest households are between 12 and 18 percent of household income.

Working Moms and Child Care
Heather Boushey and Joseph Wright, Center for Economic and Policy Research, May 5, 2004
Executive Summary
Full report in .pdf

back to top


Government removes data on working women
from DOL Web site

A new report from the National Council for Research on Women (www.ncrw.org) details how information related to women’s health, jobs, and violence against women has been altered, removed from circulation, or withheld from the public by U.S. government agencies. More than two dozen publications and fact sheets, including a handbook explaining women’s rights in the workplace, fact sheets on child care best practices and equal pay, and statistical reports comparing women’s earnings to men’s over a 20 year period have been pulled from the Department of Labor’s Women’s Bureau Web site.

New or remaining are publications on the site include fact sheets covering such optimistic topics as “Hot Jobs for the 20th Century” and “Women in High Tech Jobs.” The NCRW’s Missing: Information About Women’s Lives strongly suggests the pattern of withholding and altering new and existing information on issues that affect women's lives is politically motivated and partisan in nature.

The documents removed from the Women’s Bureau Web site, which highlighted trends in women’s workforce participation, occupations and wages, were especially useful for equal pay advocates and journalists covering work/life issues. The NCRW has launched a project to retrieve the missing information from other sources.

April 28, 2004 Press Release from
the National Council for Research on Women:

Report Documents Disturbing Pattern of Vital Information Important to Girls and Women Disappearing (in .pdf)

Missing: Information About Women’s Lives
Executive Summary (in. pdf)
Full report (in .pdf)

On Salon.com:
Making Women’s Issues Go Away
By Rebecca Traister, April 28, 2004

back to top


The uncertain future of overtime pay
On April 20, the Bush administration released the final version of new regulations determining which employees are eligible for overtime pay. Even though some of the more controversial elements of the proposed changes were modified prior to the final release, critics insist that if enforced, the new rules—which revise guidelines for legal exemptions for overtime pay for executives, professionals and administrative employees—would mean longer hours and less pay for millions of American workers. The rulings would allow employers to classify non-degreed workers as “professionals” as long as they have “substantially similar” knowledge and do substantially similar tasks. Among those who might loose their right to overtime pay under the new standards are nursery school and pre-school teachers. According to an analysis by Ross Eisenbrey of the Economic Policy Institute (www.epinet.org), under the new regulations not only would millions of workers who are currently eligible for overtime pay become exempt, but the ambiguity of new definitions for exempt and non-exempt employees guarantees an “explosion” of litigation—an outcome the revisions were intended to minimize.

According the New York Times, the Senate voted 52 to 47 on May 4 to block regulations denying overtime pay to any worker now qualified to receive it. The AFL-CIO (www.aflcio.org), which has launched an aggressive grass-roots write-in campaign to protect overtime pay, reports that House Republicans have refused to allow a debate or vote on a motion that would protect overtime pay for workers who will be exempt under the new rules. Unless Congress blocks the new regulations, employers will be free to implement them as of August 23.

More information from the Economic Policy Institute:
Fair Pay Fact:
The Department of Labor’s Misrepresentations About Its Overtime Rule

Ross Eisenbrey, Economic Policy Institute, May 11, 2004

Saying goodbye to overtime checks
By Ross Eisenbrey, Economic Policy Institute, May 11, 2004
Economic Policy Institute, March 21, 2004

AFL-CIO Working America
Campaign to Save Overtime Pay

back to top


Wall Street Journal to re-entry moms:
Unhappy Mother’s Day!

Just in time for Mother’s Day, the Wall Street Journal handed a big fat reality check to mothers hoping to re-start their careers after years of full-time child rearing. The page one article (“After Years Off, Women Struggle To Revive Careers” by WSJ staff reporters Anne Marie Chalker and Hillary Stout, May 6, 2004) describes the difficulties these re-entry professionals face just trying to get their foot in the door, let alone a good job offer. The article quotes the top executive of a company that matches woman job seekers with recruiters:

If an employer uses the criteria ‘We will hire the best person for the job,’ I think it’s very difficult to choose someone who’s been out of the workforce that long.’ Appplicants sometimes point to their volunteer work, or experience as ‘head of the household… the woman who does everything.’ …The theory of it sounds really great, but the reality is it’s very difficult.”

But you already knew that, right?

The Wall Street Journal does not provide access to online content to non-subscribers, so check your local library— or better yet, sneak a peek at this blogged .pdf copy of the article.

back to top


Not new, but newly discovered:
Center for Advancement of Women’s report on women’s attitudes about motherhood, work and the women’s movement

In June 2003, The Center for the Advancement of Women (www.advancewomen.org) published the results of a two-year study of women’s political priorities and personal outlooks on work and family. The study found that 6 out 10 women believe there is a need for a revitalized movement that will “push for changes that will benefit women,” including reducing violence against women, equal pay and child care. The report— which also tracks women’s opinions about motherhood and work— found that 90 percent of more than 3,000 women surveyed agreed that it’s possible for a woman to have a career and be a good mother at the same time. And while women were most likely to identify “motherhood” as the most important aspect of their sense of self, 7 out of 10 agreed that becoming a mother is not necessary to have a complete life.

Progress and Perils: New Agenda for Women
Executive Summary (.pdf)
Full reports

— MMO, May 2004

back to top


Previously in MMO Noteworthy ...

Reuse of content for publication or compensation by permission only.
© 2003-2008 The Mothers Movement Online.

editor@mothersmovement.org

The Mothers Movement Online