www.mothersmovement.org
Resources and reporting for mothers and others who think about social change.
home
directory
features
noteworthy
opinion
essays
books
resources
get active
discussion
mail
submissions
e-list
about mmo
search
 
mmo blog
 

The Rhetoric of Motherhood by Abby Arnold

page four

These expectations of naturalness, and the dire consequences of not following the natural way, don’t just start with parenting the baby. They start with pregnancy, and especially to what is so frequently called “The Birth Experience.”

For some women, labor and delivery goes like this: labor begins, whether through the thrilling rush of the amniotic fluid rupturing or through a sense of menstrual cramps that grows into something definitely ‘other.’ Either way, the woman contacts her doctor or midwife and goes to the place—home or hospital—where she has planned to give birth. Labor becomes uncomfortable and intense, but she manages. She has the help of a loving, supportive partner and perhaps another coach, a calm and competent practitioner, breathing exercises, back massage, ice chips. She imagines the face of her new baby to get her through the difficult moments. Perhaps someone comes in and suggests she needs stronger medical intervention, such as an IV, an epidural, or the baby monitor. “No,” she, or one of her devoted coaches says, “it’s not in the birth plan,” at the mention of which all attempts at intervention stop, never to be resumed. And then she pushes and grunts, feeling more powerful than she ever has or will again in her life. The baby is born, everyone cries, and the infant is placed on the mother’s chest. They stare into each other’s eyes with mutual recognition and then the baby roots out the breast, latches on and sucks vigorously. The woman’s birth experience is complete.

For some women, labor and delivery goes like that. For most women, it doesn’t. For most women, something—even if the something is nothing more than the overwhelming, unimagined intensity of the pain—goes wrong. Insulated from pain as we are by the Tylenol we take for even minor headaches, nothing in our lives has prepared many women for the pain of labor. Certainly not the books.

In the section on Labor and Delivery in What to Expect When You’re Expecting, the “Bible” of modern pregnancy, pain is hinted at exactly twice. It is called “increasing discomfort with contractions” (293) during the active phase of labor. The transition stage is referred to as “exhausting and demanding.” (297). What to Expect also tells a woman that her “self-pity” may make her “perception of pain”(298) worse. Instead of feeling this self-pity—and thus the pain of labor—they inform us that the pregnant woman should be “Thinking about how lucky you are and about the wonderful reward ahead.” (298).

This certainly didn’t work for me—when I was in the full force of active labor and living in the hell that is waiting for the anesthesiologist to deliver the epidural, my nurse told me to think of the baby to get me through. “Fuck the baby,” I roared, meaning it more than any almost other emotion I have ever had in my life. An unknown baby was no match for the contractions of labor. Later, the nurse told me that was a mild statement compared to what she’d heard many other women say.

What to Expect, while technically stating the words all women are different and any healthy birth is a good birth, actually uses its language to promote a very particular kind of birthing experience: one where “natural” is good, and most medical intervention is wrong. Here, for example, is what they have to say about asking for strong pain reliever during labor:

If you feel you need some pain relief, don’t be afraid to discuss it with your attendant. He or she may suggest waiting for 20 minutes or half an hour before actual administration—at which point you may have made so much progress that you won’t need it, or you may have found renewed strength and no longer want it (294).

Assumption #1: That there is something to be afraid of in asking for pain relief.

Assumption #2: That a laboring woman in need of pain medication is able to “discuss” anything. Demand, rage, plead, roar or moan are more likely verbs here.

Assumption #3: That your attendant does not want you to have pain relief.

Assumption #4: That if you are strong you won’t need it.

Rock Bottom Assumption Guiding All of the Above: There is something wrong with using pain medication while in labor and you don’t want it.

Through assumptions like these that guide their language, What To Expect quite steadily pushes its agenda of a particular kind of birthing experience. More insidiously, it assumes that this is the experience most women will achieve.

The image of the laboring mother maintaining her power and control, where the pain remains manageable and support surrounds her like a warm bath, where medical intervention is solely devoted to enhancing the mother’s birth experience, where the birth plan works and breast feeding is easy and mutually enjoyable, is held out to be the ideal, what all women not only should strive for but naturally, automatically want. Dr. Sears tells women to “take responsibility for orchestrating the birth you want”(5), as if this action is easily achieved.

When they don’t get it, many women feel that they have failed, even when they deliver a healthy baby. Susan Maushart, the author of The Mask of Motherhood, says that the relentless focus on the woman’s “performance” during the “birth experience,” rather than the child it produces, creates “the greatest shift of all in our social construction of childbirth: that the “object” of the enterprise is no longer seen to be the end product (the baby) but the process itself (69). Maushart states that for the modern woman, who is almost guaranteed a healthy baby, the loss of control during labor is the most frightening part of the experience, and the disjunction between our expectations of control and performance, and “the sheer brute force of the birthing body” (72) leads many new mothers to feel anger, shame and “a yawning psychic chasm” (73) after the birth of their baby.

Childbirth is dangerous. I’m sure that the Bible, for example, does not describe childbirth as a punishment for women because there is some “discomfort” involved. Medical intervention is sometimes unwarranted, certainly driven to some extent by the overwhelming law suits directed towards physicians who don’t intervene and then something goes wrong, but almost always intended to insure the safety of both the mother and unborn child. The truth is, American women go into labor with an almost 100 percent statistical certainty that both they and their child will survive. This is the first time this has been true in human history and is in large part due to medical intervention. Yet the language of natural childbirth would have us believe that medical intervention is itself the danger.

Childbirth is not an experience we can control. It is, to use a cliché, one of the 2 great mysteries of life (death being the other) and as such, almost completely out of capacity to understand, let alone organize to our liking. We can, to some extent, given the requirements of our health insurance (if we’re lucky enough to have it), determine our physician or midwife. We can take our breathing classes, learn about the stages of labor, equip ourselves intellectually for the experience, hopefully arrange for an experienced woman to be with us in the labor room along with a life partner, if we are lucky enough to have one. But when labor starts, the woman’s intellect is her least valuable or accessible resource.

Labor controls the woman, the woman does not control the labor.

next:
the cultural construction of motherhood

page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | notes

Reuse of content for publication or compensation by permission only.
© 2003-2008 The Mothers Movement Online.

editor@mothersmovement.org

The Mothers Movement Online