Each
morning before school, while Benjamin watched Sesame Street,
I wrote in my record books. On the days when he was with me I
used his nap time to record my dreams. But it seemed so paltry,
such a compromise that, hearing the mocking laughter in my head
from the real artists, I would stop, ashamed. It is difficult
enough to be a woman and a serious artist. But to be a mother
too was to deny the lessons of history: the great women writers
and the women shamans of non-Western culture had traditionally
been childless. And I was not turning out to be a woman who flew
in the face of history.
…"What
in the world do you want?" James would ask me, as I continued
to examine the contradictions between the woman I had turned into
and the woman I might have been. "Perfection?"
"Well,
yes, a sort of perfection. A situation where I could comfortably
leave my child and then do my work."
--
Jane Lazarre, The Mother Knot, 1976
Although
Jane Lazarre's remarkable memoir of her first years of
motherhood was published nearly 30 years ago, the resonance -- and
relevance -- of her story has barely faded. In The Mother Knot,
Lazarre writes unsparingly of "the strange and paradoxical
way in which the infinite kind of love we feel for our children
is locked into the dull, enervating routine of caring for them,"
and of her personal struggle to liberate enough solitude and time
from the steady pull of marriage and motherhood to honor her own
creative drive. In her more recent works, which include the 1991
novel Worlds Beyond My Control and the memoir Beyond
the Whiteness of Whiteness (1999), Lazarre continues to use
the lens of motherhood to expand the themes of attachment and separation,
self and other, Blackness and whiteness, silence and the power of
truth.
To reject the myth of
the perfect mother and insist that women's lives are larger than
"being somebody's mother, or somebody's wife" -- as Lazarre
did when she when she wrote The Mother Knot -- was, and
still is, a profoundly political act. As an activist at heart, I
long for a sudden, sweeping social transformation to resolve the
motherhood problem once and for all. Fortunately, I've also learned
that the first step toward changing the world is starting a conversation.
The MMO takes great pleasure in presenting an interview
with Jane Lazarre.
Judith
Stadtman Tucker
July/August 2005
|
MMO:
In "Beyond the Whiteness of Whiteness," you write
that "the experience of motherhood and the many ways in which
that experience reveals, sustains and constantly recreates my sense
of connection to and responsibility toward a wider world" has
been your lifelong subject. As your sons grew into men, how did the
intersection between your motherhood and your creative work -- the
push-pull you described so vividly in "The Mother Knot"
-- change? Has anything not changed?
Jane Lazarre: From
the time I was pregnant for the first time, in 1969, my awareness
of my relationship to the world beyond my personal experience changed,
although of course I was not fully aware of the change at first
and could not articulate it as I might today. At the time I was
a graduate student in anthropology and, because I was pregnant,
I was focusing on narratives about pregnancy and child birth gathered
from women in various cultures. It was obvious to me that a woman’s
experience, from her own point of view, had been excluded from much
of our records and even our art. I was greatly helped in this awareness
by the fact that I was pregnant and had my first child at a time
when women were coming to consciousness about our lives in the context
of a broad social movement. The whole idea of “women’s
groups,” then spreading across the country, was rooted in
the belief that when people tell their own stories honestly, commonalities
will emerge, and from these commonalities, political perspectives
and possibilities for action. The movement for day care, as well
as for reproductive rights, for equal pay, and for a revised analysis
of housework and motherhood, all came out of this belief, out of
this time.
Nevertheless, the “push-pull” as you call it between
the demands of motherhood and the need for creative work, or simply
for paying work, continued. In certain ways I believe this push-pull
is inevitable -- an aspect of the human condition and in particular
of the situation of parenting. The demands of others often conflict
with one’s own needs. The demands of children do even more
often. There is no way to alleviate this conflict completely, in
my opinion. Mothers sacrifice one way or another. While I was working
as a journalist, when my children were finally in public school
in kindergarten, I wrote a story called "Soul Searching from
9 to 3:30." At that time, soul searching (which in my case
meant writing) ceased. I picked them up at school and began the
jobs most mothers are familiar with until I fell into bed at night.
There was, though, a creative underside to this, one I have talked
about over the years with my undergraduate writing students. I learned,
by necessity, how to resist romanticizing inspiration through habits
of discipline. This struggle went against many mystified narratives
about "the artist," and it is one many feminist writers
and artists who are mothers have written about. There were other
times when I frankly put my children’s needs ahead of my own
need for creative work, as when we decided to send them to private
school and I took a full time teaching job I have just retired from
after twenty-two years. Now, for the first time in my life, I have
time to write with no other work responsibilities. This time is
only just begun. I am frightened, of course, that the habits of
structuring my own life, with no students to teach and no children
to care for, will not be easy to resume, but there is also a great
sense of excitement. I suppose I am saying, then, that at different
times in a life the "push pull" is different. But the
conflict, I assume, will always be a part of any passionate love.
At any age, or stage, however, the social structures and realities
in the world either enable, make it difficult, or impossible, to
find personal ways to encompass -- if not resolve -- these contradictions.
Issues of child care, economic and housework equality, reproductive
rights -- all permit a greater or lesser choice for women who are
mothers or for anyone. An example from my own current life: As a
full time faculty member in a liberal arts college, I have a reasonable
pension. I am also married to a man who is not retired -- a personal
as well as a social-economic reality. Colleagues who are "adjuncts"
or part time faculty, doing much the same work as I did at less
than half the salary, do not have the same pension rights or, therefore,
the same choice to retire. There is a growing effort to alter this
inequality through unionization of part time faculties across the
country.
Being an artist and a mother confronted me with particular problems
of time, the need for silence and solitude, the problem of exposing
feelings about those I love or about myself that might hurt or offend
those I love. The problems of time and solitude are resolved, for
now. The others, as for any writer, remain.
MMO: How do you think
motherhood, as a social experience, has changed since the early
1970s, when your sons were small? What hasn’t changed -- or
hasn’t changed enough? Do you find it discouraging that mothers
today are facing some of the same barriers to integrating mothering
with other kinds of work as you encountered when you were a young
mother?
Jane Lazarre: Motherhood
as a social experience varies so greatly among cultures, classes,
countries, it is not possible to answer the question in only one
way. For most poor and working class women, which often includes
women in what we call the “middle classes,” very likely
not much has changed. For women in many parts of the world, there
have been few changes. Wars kill mothers’ children. Women
do not have domestic or economic power, access to health care for
themselves or their children. Few women are in powerful political
positions. Even for middle or upper middle class women in the U.S.
it is dangerous to generalize. I can speak only from personal experience
with some of the mothers I know – those of my children’s
generation who now have young children, or babies, and are also
committed to working lives through desire, economic necessity, or
both. Most seem as ambivalent and torn as when I was a young mother
in the 70s. The desire, or need, to work, is still treated as a
personal/individual problem for individual families to solve. There
is little public child care, pre or after school, that is reliable
and good for children. The prevalence of “nannies” or
housekeepers who care for children full time, is as prevalent as
ever in New York City in the wealthier neighborhoods. There were,
and are, complicated problems of class, racial and ethnic conflict
implicit in the child/caretaker or childcare worker/working mother
relationship. For the mothers, I sometimes think, not much has changed
since I went to the playgrounds with my children and felt caught
between the mothers who worked and had disdain for those who "just
stayed home," and those who were full time mothers and homemakers
who resented and judged those who worked full time. I have no easy
answer for the problem. In my own case, the resolution was a parent
run day care center in which mothers and fathers retained a strong
voice and participated regularly. But that solution began to erode
too as more families joined in which the mothers had full time jobs,
rather than the free lance work done by many of us who created the
center.
The “social experience
of motherhood” you ask about was, and is -- even now that
my sons are grown men -- intricately and inexorably intertwined
with the psychological experience. One opens the other, the other
opens the one. I expect this is true for mothers in many different
situations, but for mothers whose lives are more or less privileged
in a world filled with deprivation, the awareness of how closely
the psychological-personal-intimate realm is connected to the social-collective-political
realm can itself be a major shift in consciousness, what Virginia
Woolf called a “moment of being,” that can suggest possibilities
for individual or collective action.
|